The goal can’t be quality, not for people anyway. It needs to be humanity. The rough edges of caring, of improv and of connection.
If all you can do is meet spec, better be sure you can do that faster and cheaper than an AI can.*
Like the old saying goes, people don’t remember stats, they remember stories.**
I don’t know if robots get headaches, or their digital equivalent. I know I’ve got one today, and it’s getting worse.
Robots and AI are taking on more and more of what we can do and probably without headaches slowing them down.
What are we left with? is a really important question. It brought me back to the critical 21st Century question:
What does it mean to you to be human?
Maria Popova is asking her own questions:
‘It is, of course, an abiding question, as old as consciousness — we are material creatures that live in a material universe, yet we are capable of experiences that transcend what we can atomize into physical facts: love, joy, the full-being gladness of a Beethoven symphony on a midsummer’s night.’^
I find myself thinking that AI and robots probably not only don’t get headaches but they don’t get to begin with greed, pride and foolishness as humans do. Yet from these starting points, the overcoming of these things on a daily basis, it often seems to me that we become most human, most imaginative and creative and loving.
Robots will do more and more of our work, life becomes more and more reduced in many ways, and yet there are untouched worlds that we get to explore as humans.
(*From Seth Godin’s blog: We can do better than meeting spec.)
(**From gapingvoid’s blog: What’s your story?)
(^From Maria Popova’s Brain Pickings: Alan Lightman on the Longing for Absolutes in a Relative World and What Gives Lasting Meaning to our Lives.)