who are you waiting for?

Peter Diamandis and Steven Kotler tell some of the XPrize story, offered for a better cleaning-up solution to the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster.  Twenty seven teams went after the $1.4 prize.  The most intriguing part of this story involves a team that didn’t actually win but came up with a solution doubled cleaning-up efficiency – they were from outside the industry and had met in a Las Vegas tattoo parlour.  It’s amazing what we can get up to with some imagination and focus.

‘The obstacles are less important that the opportunities if we replace ignorance with insight, inattention with foresight, and inaction with mobilisation … if we realise we are the people we have been waiting for.’*

This oil story reminded me I’d picked up a copy of Winning the Oil End Game, which includes amongst its authors, the wonderfully named Odd-Even Bustnes.  The book offers a vision of an oil-free United States by 2050, naming several policies that would have made this possible.  Would because Donald Trump has come to the White House with environmental policies that owe more to the ignorance, inattention, and inaction, than to insight, foresight, and mobilisation.

Whilst the story and quote are from the oil industry, the truth could be about anything within imagining and shaping a better world.

The greatest threat to a more imaginative future is thinking we know:  The best way to begin a day is to arise knowing we do not know, starting with what we do not know about ourselves and our motivations:

‘The ego self is by definition the unobserved self, because once you see it, the game is over.’^

This ego is the self that is less than we can be.  It is a compassionate activity when we are prepared to look beneath the surface of our life, though some, like E. O.Wilson, discredit compassionate behaviour as hypocritical and calculated:

‘”[Homo sapiens] good behaviour is calculating, often in a wholly conscious way, and his manoueveres are orchestrated by the excruciatingly intricate sanctions and demands of society.”

No doubt, some will use compassion as a technique or skill to get something but there are many who are deeply fascinated at what this means for us as a species. When you think about it, life is all about compassion.  Opening our minds, hearts, and wills are compassionate actions.  Compassion makes it possible to look at ourselves more honestly and hopefully towards our future Self, and then to look at others, our societies, and the environment of which we are a part and are sustained.

H are the most important words:

If we realise we are the people we have been waiting for.

(*From Amory Lovins, Kyle Datta, and Odd-Even Bustnes’ Winning the Oil Endgame.  I use the acronym TEESA to remind me to read around Technology, Entrepreneurship, Environment, Society, Arts – this book is my environmental read.)
(**From Richard Rohr’s The Naked Now.)
(^E. O. Wilson, quoted in Karen Anderson’s Twelve Steps to a Compassionate Life.)

give it time, or, the journey out of suckerhood

Yuval Noah Harari claims, ‘history’s choices are not made for the benefit of humans,’ that we’re unable to claim one worldview is better than another.*  Furthermore he purports the notion that cultural ideas are simply parasitical,  inhabiting their human hosts, spreading from person to person and generation to generation in memetic fashion:

‘They multiply and spread from one host to another, occasionally weakening the hosts and sometimes even killing them. … cultures are mental parasites that emerge accidentally, and thereafter take advantage of all people infected by them. … The nationalist virus presented itself as being beeneficial for humans; yet it has been beneficial mostly for itself.’*

I understand what Harari is saying here but it feels like only half the story: the half that says, The stories we tell ourselves, as to how life on earth is best lived, are just that – stories, and we can tell ourselves better stories.  Hugh Macleod and Nassim Taleb give me more hope for our relationship with ideas.  First of all, Hugh Macleod proffers:

‘Helping to fix a company culture and helping a company to become more creative are actually the same thing. … Creativity and culture in the workplace come from the same place. … Creating culture is creating meaning within your organisation.’**

That culture is the product of creativity and creativity needs to be embedded in culture pertains to more than the business world.  We can’t have one without the other.  None of us were very old when we first stepped into our creativity, and at that moment a universe of possibility opened before us and cultures emerged – both large and small.  But, where either of these exist for their own sake, we find absence rather than presence.

Nassim Taleb shares in his inimitable way how openness to another offers the possibility of a better culture:

‘Half of suckerhood is not realising that what you don’t like might be loved by someone else (hence, by you later), and the reverse.’^

There’s no requirement for most of the lines we have drawn between “them and us” when it comes to seeking the way of presence over absence.

‘”We unwittingly amplify commonalities with friends, dissimilarities with strangers, and contrasts with enemies.’^

How would creativity and culture best meet?

Compassion appears best placed as a place of hope, for stepping into another’s world.  Any creativity or culture that unable to step into another’s world is not worth having, though it may be worth fixing – itself a compassionate act.

Two-and-a-half thousand years ago, Confucius expressed what we recognise as the golden rule:

‘people should not put themselves in a special, privileged category but should relate their own experience to that of others “all day and every day.”  Confucius called this ideal ren, a word that originally meant ‘noble’ or ‘worthy’ but which by his time simply meant ‘human.” … A person who behaved with ren “all day and every day” would become a junzi, a mature human.’^^

Of course, this is still a story we tell ourselves, but it’s a pretty good one.

(*From Yuval Noah Harari’s Sapiens.)
(**From Hugh Macleod’s gapingvoid.)
(^From Nassim Taleb’s The Bed of Procrustes.)
(^^From Karen Anderson’s Twelve Steps to a Compassionate Life.)

the poet

‘The first breath of morning breaks the dark enough
to let the sky out of night, it gathers up
the trust of trees that leaned with such relief
against the dark, leaves them stripped and lost
to reach ever further into the nowhere of air.’*

John O’Donohue could have written, “It’s the morning and with the increasing light I can see more of my surroundings,” though this wouldn’t have caught my attention.  Instead, by using familiar words in different ways, O’Donohue says more with less: I notice and I feel the dawn.

There’s something about a poet and her poem that can make us feel and value life while we have it.  Soon enough it will be gone and we will be forgotten.

‘Let nothing bless
the human head
that climbed so high
to praise itself.’*

Whilst our willingness to be forgotten may be our greatest humility, this is not about death.  It’s about life and joy.  We’re not dead yet, so while we see the light coming each day to us, we  have life.

‘One thing that comes out in myths is that at the bottom of the abyss comes the voice of salvation.  The black moment when the real message of transformation is going to come.  At the darkest moment comes the light.’**

‘The greatest art is an intersection of contrasts … pain and healing, despair and hope, darkness and light.’^

Our art is both myth and poem, holding together that which would normally be missed, helping us to see how things are and that we can overcome and live richly.  I can miss what is already there.

In his pilgrimage, Paulo Coelho’s guide Petrus teaches a simple walking exercise.  At first Coelho feels tortured but then he begins to see more:

“Walk for twenty minutes at half the speed at which you normally walk.  Pay attention to the details, people, and surroundings.  The best time to do this is after lunch.’^^

‘The world was there around me, and I realised that seldom had I paid attention to it.’^^

You are a poet, able to make more with less.

I leave the final word with Coelho’s guide Petrus:

“Changing the way you do routine things allows a new person to grow inside of you.”^^

(*From John O’Donohue’s Echoes of Memory: Betrayed by Light.)
(**From Joseph Campbell and Bill Moyers’ The Power of Myth.)
(^From Erwin McManus’s The Artisan Soul.)
(^^From Paulo Coelho’s The Pilgrimage.)

my poem

For those who seek a different wisdom to the prevailing wisdom, an alternative story to the one often told.

‘I sit, alert
behind the small window
of my mind and watch
the days pass,
who have no reason
to look in.’*

Will this wisdom come to us?  Or must we seek the story?

Whilst reflecting on these words from John O’Donohue I reread some words that caught my attention a year ago:

‘All great spirituality is somehow about letting go.’**

Understanding spirituality in its widest sense, I’m wonder if there’s something I must let go if the different story is to come – what my friend Alex McManus has called the ‘open possibility of tomorrow.’^

Another  note catches my eye, this time from Gretchen Rubin:

“When the student is ready, the teacher appears.”^^

I must miss so many things when I’m not ready.

But sometimes we’re never ready.  What then?

So I wonder how we can make ourselves ready.  That is, how we might open and increase our readiness, though I suspect it isn’t easy.  What if we notice something we want to see some change in?

Jean-Pierre Siméon’s book This is a Poem that Heals Fish tells the story of a child discovering what a poem is and what it does.  Arthur’s fish Leon is stricken with boredom.  His  mother tells him to give the fish a poem, and then leaves for a tuba lesson!  He is left searching for a poem.  After searching in the kitchen to no avail be, Arthur begins to ask people to describe a poem.  Each person gives a different answer; his grandfather tells him:

“A poem, well … It’s what poets make. … Even if the poets do not know it themselves.”*^

After all the answers the boy returns to his fish confused.  He begins by saying he doesn’t know what a poem is but continues with what he knows from all the answers he’s been given – this is, of course, his poem

A poem
is when you have the sky in your mouth.
It is hot like fresh bread,
when you eat it,
a little is always left over.

A poem
is when you hear
the heartbeat of a stone,
when words beat their wings.
It is a song sung in a cage.

A poem
is words turned upside down
and suddenly!
the world is new.*^

This story contains many things but here are two.

Arthur begins with his concern for Leon and a journey begins.

His grandfather’s response really is pointing to how we all have a poem – and we may not know this.  We may use the same words as others, but differently, in telling about the things that matter to us.

The magic of a poem is how we are able to make more with less.

I’ve just picked up Karen Armstrong’s Twelve Step to a Compassionate Life.  Armstrong by telling how she was granted a wish for a better world by TED, so she launched a charter for compassion.

I love the idea of this but we don’t have to wait for TED or anyone else to grant us a wish.  We’ve been granted one already.  We also get to make it come true:

‘You can’t receive what you don’t give,’ as Eckart Tolle said^*

This is about our poem.

When I notice what it is
I notice,
when I turn my attention
to this,
bringing my hands to what I see,
I am discovering
my poem.

(*Cottage, from John O’Donohue’s Echoes of Memory.)
(**From Richard Rohr’s The Naked Now.)
(^From Alex McManus’s Makers of Fire.)
(^^From Gretchen Rubin’s The Happiness Project.)
(*^Grandfather in Jean-Pierre Simeon’s This is a Poem that Heals Fish, quoted in Maria Popova’s BrainPickings.)
(^*From Eckhart Tolle’s A New Earth.)

an unredacted life

‘A poem turns words around, upside down, and – suddenly! – the world is new.”

Sometimes a poem is just what we need.

‘In coils of wave, winding in dance, the sea
Is too fluent to feel its own silence,
Only for the sure gaze and grip of share
It would not know itself to be the sea.’*

You are the shore to my sea.  We need each other to know ourselves.

The world of messaging, texts and emails, makes it much easier to hide, for the sea hesitantly approach the shore. It becomes far easier to edit the life others see.  Relationships become more efficient rather than deep.

Hiding is easy, it’s being present that is difficult:

‘Presence is wisdom!  Presence is the one thing necessary, and in any ways, the hardest thing of all.  Just try to keep your heart open, your mind without division or resistance, and your body not somewhere else.’**

Hard but not impossible.  My hope is that,, whilst technology advances, the sea will still reach the shore.

(*From Jean-Pierre Simeon’s This is a Poem That Heals Fish, quoted in Maria Popova’s BrainPickings blog.)
(**From John O’Donohue’s Echoes of Memory: Expectation.)

(^From Richard Rohr’s The Naked Now.)

focus and breadth

It’s important not to get these the wrong way around.

Covering many things probably means we won’t get a lot done … well.  Bringing a breadth of people to work on something specific provides impact.

‘More breadth … doesn’t cause change … . Focus works.  A sharp edge cuts through the clutter.’*

‘The massively transformative purpose (MTP) galvanises passion, attracting the best talent and inspiring them to give it their all.’**

Peter Diamandis and Steven Kotler describe the power of an MTP for focusing and providing breadth in the best ways: twenty five teams compete for the prize offered for the design of spaceships at one hundredth of the cost of the original vehicles sent into space.

We don’t have to get into competitions for designing a new generation of spacecraft to experience the power of the right kinds of focus and breadth.  Who wouldn’t want to harness the power passion, talent, and giving all?

Behind this there are people identifying their personal foci, being able to add this to a breadth of people working together to bring about change, not because they feel they have to but because they want to.

‘In the sphere of material things giving means being rich.  Not she who has much, but she who gives much. … She gives of herself, of the most precious she has, she gives of her life.  This does not necessarily mean that she sacrifices her life for the other – but that she gives her that which is alive in her: she gives her of her knowledge, of her humour, of her sadness – of all expressions and manifestations of that which is alive in her. … Love is the active concern for the life and the growth of that which we love.’^

“What stands in the way becomes the way.”^^

What we choose to love comes from within, not without.  Personal responsibility isn’t something forced upon us but is what we come to believe we must do – this in response to the needs we see in the world around us and others may not.  If we really live in a world of abundance rather than one of scarcity, something quite astonishing happens when we understand we have what we need to create a compelling story to live in.

‘Every creative endeavour becomes a realisation of both how limited and unlimited we are.’*^

I know I’m limited – but others complete what I lack.  This is the importance of breadth.

I do know how unlimited you are – because you haven’t come to the end of exploring your passion, talent and giving of your all.

(*From Seth Godin’s blog Holding Your Breadth.)
(**From Peter Diamandis and Steven Kotler’s Bold.)
(^From Erich Fromm’s The Art of Loving.  I have changed the gender from him to her; I don’t think Fromm would mind – he was writing in the 1950s.)
(^^Marcus Aurelius, quoted in Ryan Holliday’s The Obstacle is the Way.)
(*^From Erwin McManus’ The Artisan Soul.)

maps 4.0

‘… it is just coincidence that most people today believe in nationalism, capitalism and human rights.  History cannot be explained deterministically and it cannot be predicted because it is chaotic’*

When he mentions chaos, Yuval Noah Harari is thinking about two levels of chaos – one being the natural world and universe, the other being what happens when we react to this world and universe.  Life cannot be predicted without hindsight, that is, ‘an event that has already taken place has 100% probability.’  As we turn towards the future, the probability percentile drops.**

Harari wouldn’t have known but the order in which he mentions nationalism, capitalism, and human rights, causes me to think of Theory U‘s Societies 1.0 to 3.0.  In a nutshell, 1.0 is an autocratic society in which a few people determine the fates of everyone else.  This spawned 2.0 with the merchant traders and guilds becoming the forerunners of industrial capitalists.  In response to these initiators, groups began to organise themselves for protection, trade unions and, later environmental groups: 3.0.  Each of these have left a hertitage of “maps” and are still creating them – and maps are very important, as Denis Wood is at pains to point out:

‘In no walk of life have people failed to use the power of the map to connect themselves to the world.’^

Denis Wood makes a helpful point when it comes to the shortcomings of Society 3.0 – some are always left out:

‘Accusingly, there seems to be no geography of children, that is, the earth’s surface as the home of children.’^

I think this is changing but there’s always someone left out and this begs the question about what the characteristics of Society 4.0 and its maps will be.  Perhaps this is where we find ourselves but I remind myself that just when you think the world is moving forward, there’s something that happens to yank us back.  I confess my optimism, though.

Maps 4.0, I think, will involve the different ways and places in which we find each other.

‘Every social association that is not face-to-face is injurious to your health.’^^

‘What connects us beyond our kinship ties?  Story.’*^

Whilst 3.o is about rights, 4.0 isn’t about everyone having the same.  It’s going to be more about those who make the discovery that they are able to give and, therefore, to receive:

‘Whoever is capable of giving of himself is rich.’^*

(*From Yuval Noah Harari’s Sapiens.)
(**From Nassim Taleb’s Fooled by Randomness.)
(^From Denis Wood’s The Power of Maps.)
(**From Nassim Taleb’s The Bed of Procrustes.)
(*^From Jonathan Gottschall’s The Storytelling Animal.)
(^*From Erich Fromm’s The Art of Loving.)


inclusive is the new exclusive*

‘Being inclusive … means building an identity upon letting people in.  And redefining who you want to be by who you want to be with.’*

Everyone is capable of doing something in a way no-one else can – we often miss the nuances but there’s some way of relating or thinking or behaving that brings a slightly different dimension or perspective.  It doesn’t mean we have to act all exclusive because of it, though.

Alan Lightman tells a story from his early research days when, in the final days of writing things up for publication, he came upon a freshly published article from two Japanese scientist who’d solved the same problem, with results within three decimal places:

‘I experienced a complex set of emotions.  I was embarrassed.  I was humiliated.  I grieved the loss of several months of my time.  I worried about whether the wasted effort would compromise my chances for an assistant professorship.  But then, another emotion began working its way through my body.  Amazement.  I was utterly amazed that people on the others side of the planet, with no correspondence between us, no comparing of notes, had decided to solve the same problem and had gotten the same answer to three decimal points.  There was something wonderful and thrilling about that’**

Beneath this personal tale of being scooped, then realising how amazing science and mathematics are, there’s a personal journey from exclusivity into inclusivity witnessing Lightman moving to a place of wonder.  As John O’Donohue insightfully writes, ‘when you wonder, you are drawn out of yourself.’^

To make a personal or corporate journey from exclusivity into inclusivity isn’t easy, though, especially as it requires suspending the way we see things in order to see from another person’s perspective, redirecting our attention from ourselves towards others, and letting go of exclusive goals for inclusive ones shared with others.  Inclusivity means we get to wonder from the inside of things.

“When the universe makes you wonder, all is at it should be.”^^

What’s more, people who include those excluded by others are also including themselves.  Ultimately is a loving act.  Erich Fromm offers a helpful framing of love:

‘Love is an activity, not a passive affect; it is “standing in,” not “falling for.”  In the most general way, the active character of love can be described by stating that love is primarily giving, not receiving. … Giving is the highest expression of potency.  In the very act of giving, I experience my strength, my wealth, my power.  This … fills me with joy.  I experience myself as overflowing, spending, alive, hence as joyous … in the act of giving lies the expression of aliveness.’

Love is giving and, therefore inclusive; it’s not waiting to receive, especially permission from others – which is how we often let exclusivity win.

Bring what you see.

‘I envy
… the absolute eyes of children,
meeting everything
dirt blobs jewelled,
rusty strips of tin,
ducks, dogs, flowers …’*^

(*From Hugh Macleod’s gapingvoid blog.)
(**From Alan Lightman’s A Sense of the Mysterious.)
(^From John O’Donohue’s Eternal Echoes.)
(^^Cirque de Soleil’s Varekai, quoted in Alex Mcmanus’ Makers of Fire.)
*^From John O’Donohue’s Echoes of Memory.)

blue not red

‘Value is in the spaces between people.’*

Some environments value competitiveness in order to produce results: beneficial short-term but often destructive long-term.  The flip of this is submission on the part of some to those with dominant characters or ideas – again, this strategy has short-term benefits but long term is corrosive to creativity.

To create value between people requires everyone turning up with their personal value or sense of worth – we’re all meant to be explorers of our personal value.

Three creativity myths: only a few people are creative, creativity is a solo occupation, and, creativity is about finding answers rather than asking questions.

Competitive or abdicating spaces are red – people get hurt, either by the excessive cut and thrust, or by an inner undermining of personal value.  Spaces filled with personal creativeness are blue – not only blue as in blue sky and open, but also in being hyperlinked – taking the conversation, planning, executing to new places.

Alan Lightman smokes his grandfather’s pipe and is taken in a Proustian like way to a time he never knew – his grandfather had died before he was born.  Lighting the pipe released smells locked up in the pipe for all those years.  Lightman reflects:

‘There is a kind of time travel to be had if you don’t insist on how it happens.’**

I’m not advocating taking up smoking but I’m thinking about a kind of time travel made possible when we are open to what another brings – all the experience and expertise built over so many years, often encapsulated in a story they tell.  This kind of blueness is made possible by being present, listening not only with our minds but our hearts and our bodies, too – this can take longer to write than how it looks in realtime, so it doesn’t necessarily take more time than going with the harde=-headed or the “tried and tested.”  As Brené Brown points out, the relationship between being present to others and being present in the moment of activity is one of blueness:

‘mindfulness and flow aren’t in competition with each other.  They aren’t the same thing but they share the same foundation: making a choice to pay attention’^

Yesterday I was part of a conversation exploring the compassionate university.  A larger understanding of the dynamics of compassion consists of compassion to others, compassion to society, compassion to our world, and compassion to self.   Compassion requires presence, presence requires compassion.  It is about allowing spaces between people to be full of value and meaning and therefore to be blue, producing more than we could otherwise imagine.

A year ago I had begun to read Roz and Ben Zander’s The Art of Possibility.  What I’d read a year ago today offers fitting words to close with, that is, to open with:

‘The action in a universe of possibility may be characterised as generative, or giving, in all senses of that words – producing new life, creating new ideas, consciously endowing with meaning, contributing, yielding to the power of contexts.  The relationship between people and environments is highlighted, not the people and things themselves.  Emotions that are relegated to the special category of spirituality are abundance here: joy, grace, awe, wholeness, passion, and compassion.’

(*From Hugh Macleod’s gaping void.com.)
(**From Alan Lightman’s Dance for Two.)
(^From Brené Brown’s Rising Strong.)
(^^From Rosamund and Benjamin Zander’s The Art of Possibility.  My TOP READ of 2016.)

the additionist

“You get reduced to a list of your favourite things … in a conversation, it might be interesting that on a trip to Europe with my parents, I get interested in the political mural art in Belfast.  But on a Facebook page, this is too much information.  It would be the kiss of death.”*

Sherry Turkle acknowledges that self presentation conflicts for adolescents is nothing new, rather, ‘What is new is living them out in public.’**

This is not about being hesitant about social technologies so much as about enlarging life.   What we can find, however, is that it takes our attention away from what is more important.  Hugh Macleod reflects on our timeless needs:

‘Our needs aren’t changing.  They’ve been the same since day one.  The point of technology is to make filling those needs easier – no to change them, and certainly not to create new ones.’^

Technology is mesmerising at times but often comes with conditions – these often don’t become and issue until it’s too late.  Seth Godin warns us about building up compromises:

‘When we add up lots of little compromises, we get to celebrate the big win.  But overlooked are the unknown costs over time, the erosion in brand, the loss in quality, the subtraction from something that took years to add up.  In a competitive environment, the key question is: What would happen if we did a little better?’^^

Godin is thinking about the marketplace but because of his heart for people, I think we stretch these words to our personal lives, brand being identity, quality meaning understanding our depths, and subtraction being about what we lose to our addictions.  This kind of addition enlarges life.

As Macleod points out, it’s about technology helping to fill our ancient needs rather than creating new ones: cyberchondria, internet rage, Facebook depression, Munchausen Syndrome.*^  (This reminded me to recharge my iPad for taking out with me and making sure my smartphone was sufficiently charged for the rest of the day – whilst I worked online writing a weblog post.)

Instead of being reductionist, I want to encourage us to become additionists – the ability to add to our lives through noticing more about what we notice more of.  Rohit Bhargava imagines a future shaped by those who develop their skills of observation:

‘I believe the future belongs to those who can learn to use their powers of observation to see the connections between industries, ideas, and behaviours and curate them into a deeper understanding of the world around us.’^*

Beyond  industries and ideas, we are each capable of developing our significant human skills to bring together in new ways the things we connect with and generate something new.

This is like a pilgrimage or quest.  When I heard that Paulo Coelho had written a book entitled The Pilgrimage, I picked up a copy to see what pictures and images for our journeys he might share along the way.

Coelho is setting out to walk the El Camino de Santiago with his guide Petrus.  He is old that he will learn things on the way:

“During the journey, I’m going to teach you exercises and some rituals that are known as practices of [Rigour, Adoration, Mercy].”⁺

The reason I mention this is because we need to find some way in which we are able to add to rather than reduce life.  Coelho’s guide Petrus speaks of there being three characteristics to a true path to freedom: agape, practical application, and it’s open to anyone.

Who would doubt the increase of love is critically important in our world, but the way must also be practical, moving it beyond a theory, and, yes, this has to be open to everyone.  Technologies cannot produce these things, but they can help.

Of course, walking towards something also means walking away from some other thing.  Of this, Geoff Nicholson has some consoling words:

‘And as I went, I realised that walking away is one of life’s greatest pleasures, whether it’s walking away from a bad job, a bad relationship, a bad educational course or a bad psychogeography festival.’⁺⁺

(*Brad, eighteen, quoted in Sherry Turkle’s Alone Together.)
(**From Sherry Turkle’s Alone Together.)
(^From Hugh Macleod’s gapingvoid.com.)
(^^From Seth Godin’s blog Counting Beans.)
(*^These came up when I googled “internet illnesses.”)
(^*From Rohit Bhargava’s Non-Obvious.)
(⁺From Paulo Coelho’s The Pilgrimage.)
(⁺⁺From Geoff Nicholson’s The Lost Art of Walking.  Psychogeography is the practice of drifting around the geography of urban environments with playfulness, like following the route of a map that appears to be the outline of a cat, noting all the cats along the way – I just made this one up.)