exploring thin|silence

I’m going to be exploring some thin|silences previously uninvestigated.  The next post will be on Monday, 10th July.

In the meantime, drop me a line if you want to find out more about what Thin|Silence looks like when it’s dreamwhispering, or doodles for the workplace or personal use.  Any design can be set up as a canvas, framed image, or notecards and bookmarks and business cards.

There’s a colouring book coming out soon: Slow Journeys in the Same Direction – again, drop me a line if you want to know more.

Advertisements

the eye of the storm

The things we see when all around us is far from perfect.  The things we see together in an indifferent universe.

Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi describes the environment in which we see, imagine, and make:

‘[The universe] is the setting for great violence, as when occasionally a star explodes, turning to ashes everything within billions of miles.  The rare planet  who gravity field would not crush our bones is probably swimming in lethal gases.  Even planet Earth, which can be so idyllic and picturesque, is not to be taken for granted.  To survive on it men and women have had to struggle for millions of years against, ice, fire, floods, wild animals, and invisible microorganisms that appear out of nowhere to snuff us out.’*

It’s a hard place to live without making it harder for each other but we know only too well that on a bad day we can do exactly this, fighting against one another in all manner of ways, discriminating against each other as if we are from different planets:

‘We discriminate, decide, qualify, and dissociate almost all whom we look at instead of loving them as they are.’**

We’re capable of more, though, drawn out here by Roz and Ben Zander when they explain the difference giving people an A makes:

‘We give the A to finesse the stronghold of judgement that grades have over our consciousness from our earliest days.’^

When we treat one another as “A people” then we’re creating an environment in which more can emerge:

‘The acknowledgement of abundance all around you awakens the dormant abundance within.’^^

The struggle to live with meaning and purpose, and with love and joy continues.

Sean Carroll identifies what has become one of the significant divides since the emergence of the major sciences, between religion and science, but Carroll want to draw a different line:

“The important distinction is not between theists and naturalists; it’s between people who care enough about the universe to make a good-faith effort to understand it, and those who fit it into a predetermined box or simply take it for granted. The universe is much bigger than you or me, and the quest to figure it out unites people with a spectrum of substantive beliefs. It’s us against the mysteries of the universe; if we care about understanding, we’re on the same side.”*^

When we see together, the possibilities we can shape, the universe changes, the world becomes the wonderful place Csikszentmihalyi alludes to, we are makers of the most beautiful and loving things in this eye of the storm:

“We are the miracle, we human beings. […] Our lives are finite, unpredictable and immeasurably precious.  Our emergence has brought meaning and mattering into the world.”*^

(*From Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s Flow.)
(**From Richard Rohr’s The Divine Dance.)
(^From Rosalind and Benjamin Zander’s The Art of Possibility.)
(^^From Eckhart Tolle’s A New Earth.)
(*^Sean Carroll, quoted in Maria Popova’s Brain Pickings: Existential Therapy from the Universe.)

 

to see uncomfortably

‘If you’re seeking to create positive change in your community, it’s almost certain you’ll be creating discomfort as well.’*

‘Data – that which we can usually measure – is supposed to make us smarter, and maybe it can, but I’d argue that it doesn’t always make us wiser. […] We don’t (or can’t) know the significance of things we have no information about, or haven’t yet thought to measure, or can’t possibly know for sure.’**

Little did the occupants of Smartworld know they were being observed.

Far away, with the most advanced technology possible, the residents of Wiseworld looked on.  Would Smartworld citizens make the same mistakes they had made long ago in their past?

They watched as the flow of automation and robotics reached the traditional building industries.   Smartworld was on the cusp of seeing building robots replace traditional workers – maybe there were twenty or thirty years left.  It was happening in the same way.  Wiseworlders had once seen this kind of technology progression of technology firstly come more kindly from within an industry – the industry would see what happened elsewhere, be inspired, and make changes.  Now the skill-machines were being thought up elsewhere; they weren’t asking for them, and they couldn’t be ignored.

Many of the Smartworlders with traditional skills had sold themselves to companies so the decisions weren’t theirs any longer.  Instead one or two people, or maybe a handful at most, made the decisions that were intended to please their stakeholders, not their employees.

As the Wiseworlders looked on, they realised this species on a far off planet were driven by the same things as they were: to be autonomous, to have mastery, and to live for a purpose beyond themselves.  The problem was, as they themselves had experienced it, selling their skills to the companies meant they were now living for someone else’s autonomy, mastery, and purpose when it came to the workplace; they too knew what it felt like to have the three motivations pushed out of the workplace and into their family and leisure lives – it never seemed so satisfying.

The Wiseworlders hadn’t demonised their bosses.  Time had shown them that their employers were like anybody else: they just couldn’t see very well.  They saw their businesses in terms of “countables” an “uncountables.”**  The countables included the number of products produced, how many hours this took, how many sick days were taken, and suchlike.  The uncountables included the ideas their workers had for improving things, how they interacted to help each other during the working day.  The thing was, because these were difficult to measure, the emphasis was invariably placed on what could be counted.

The Wiseworld bosses, when they were going through their own smart-era, thought that the difficult things to count would be covered by good wages and holidays, most finding crossing the invisible line to saying thank you an uncomfortable thing to do.

Smartworld was becoming more connected, the average daily wage was rising, age expectancy increasing, but also anxiety and depression levels were going up and it was baffling to know why.

All of these things played out on Wiseworld, too.

Until they made some breakthrough decisions.

Over a generation or so, they’d revamped their education system to include the triple focus of autonomy, mastery, and purpose, removing artificial learning barriers like upper age limits.  Now education was seen as a process of life.

Children grew up in a world where their curiosity led their learning.  First attempts at new systems were clumsy and many educationalists were for throwing in the towel, but they realised that their thinking and practices had to develop together.  They become more adept and children were brought up to identify their own work in ways that were not fixed but allowed for changes of direction along the way.

They’d come to realise that latitude was critical to success, including those who weren’t sure about which path to take to connect with others.  It had led to all kinds of confederacies of artisanship.

Wiseworlders knew, if their own history had taught them anything, it was that this was not the only or best way.  But they had come to believe openness to the future rather than being shackled to the past, was their best hope.

Their greatest dilemma was whether to leave Smartworlders to figure things out by themselves, or to send some subliminal messages which could be picked up as weak signals: dreams and hunches by those willing to face the discomfort of their curiosity on Smartworld.

(*From Seth Godin’s blog: Creating discomfort.)
(**From Bernadette Jiwa’s Hunch.)

(**Terms taken from Dan Ariely’s Payoff.)

the honest and the artificial

‘Friendship is the sweet grace which liberates us to approach, recognise and inhabit the adventure.’*

I’d pencilled a note in my journal yesterday to be pursued today: “what relationships help us to see”

It’d been the following words from cosmologist Sean Carroll that prompted me not to lose track of this dimension of seeing:

‘We don’t know how the universe began, or if it’s the only universe.  We don’t know the ultimate, complete laws of physics.  We don’t know how life began, or how consciousness arose.  And we certainly haven’t agreed on the best way to live in the world as good human beings.’**

It was the last sentence that intrigued.  In this universe where we know so little, we think we know the best way to live and yet there’s a universe of relationships to explore.

I’d these words from Roz and Ben Zander in mind – from my best read of 2016:

‘The action in a universe of possibility may be characterised as generative, or giving, in all senses of that word – producing new life, creating new ideas, consciously endowing with meaning, contributing, yielding to the power of contexts.  The relationship between people and environments is highlighted, not the people and things themselves.  Emotions that are relegated to the special category of spirituality are abundant here: joy, grace, awe, wholeness, passion, and compassion.’^

Perhaps these words describe what we hope for as “good human beings,” but the interesting thing pointed out by the Zanders is that these emotions exist in the relationships between.  It’s not so much that we join up our seeing but some new seeing comes into existence between two people.  Dan Ariely shares from his work of researching motivation:

‘As people feel connected, challenged, and engaged; as they feel trusted and autonomous, and as they get more recognition for their efforts, the total amount of motivation, joy, and output for everyone grows much larger.’^^

It’s some words from the world of brickcraft that cause me to wonder whether what we have to do is turn up in honesty.  In the 18th century, with literacy on the rise, writings on many crafts began to appear, including brickcraft.  Richard Sennett reflects on this 18th century form of honesty:

‘”Honest” brick […] evokes a building surface in which the brickwork is exposed rather than covered over: no cosmetics, no “pots of whore’s rouge” have been applied to its face.  One reason for this shift was that masons were beginning to be aware of, and feel engaged in debates about the meaning of naturalness as opposed to artifice {…}.’*^

Artifice was the disguising of what lay beneath the surface – it connects with our sense or understanding of what is artificial.  This comment on craftsmanship connects me with Maria Popova’s comment on poetic naturalism:

‘The craftsmanship of meaning amid the unfeeling laws of nature invariably calls us to use human tools like ethics and art to answer questions of what is right and beautiful.’^*

Popova is considering Carroll’s words about what makes a good human being.  We are not only producers of utility but we are also crafters weaving meaning with our artisanship.  We are seeing more.

(*From John O’Donohue’s Anam Cara.)
(**Sean Carroll, quoted in Maria Popova’s Brain Pickings: Existential Therapy from the Universe.)
(^From Rosalind and Benjamin Zander’s The Art of Possibility.)
(^^From Dan Ariely’s Payoff.)
(*^From Richard Sennett’s The Craftsman.)
(^*From Maria Popova’s Brain Pickings: Existential Therapy from the Universe.)

vuja de for the first time

Here is a story in five quotes.

Hugh Macleod points to how we want our lives to count, something life provides us with the opportunity to make happen:

‘We have to have something to live for, to look forward to.  We have to have more than existence: we have to have something inspiring.’*

Dan Ariely backs this up with his research which showed financial incentives can be less effective than our bosses noticing us and saying “Well done!”:

‘These results suggest that there is a lot more to work than merely the opportunity to earn money in exchange for about.’**

Sherry Turkle concludes her reflections on forty three year old Adam’s escape into gaming while his actual life unravels – the problem is, game playing doesn’t produce:

‘This is the sweet spot of simulation: the exhilaration of creativity without its pressures, the excitement of exploration without its risks.’^

John O’Donohue writes about what has always been there waiting to be discovered:

‘It is strange to be here.  The mystery never leaves you alone.  Behind your image, below your words, above your thoughts, the silence of another world waits.  A world lives within you.’^^

Which brings us back to something Hugh Macleod offers in conclusion to his remarks on how we have to have something to live for:

‘And then we have freedom — something that no one can ever take away.’*

Vuja de is the feeling that you are experiencing something completely new in a very familiar context.  We might then learn the art of vuja de: the ability to see what has always been there but has gone unnoticed.

The skills involved include asking different questions, knocking on different doors, and seeking different ways and paths to those we have tried in the past.  All of these are about effort.  Effort cannot be simulated.  But once we sense there’s something more, we have to have it.  Yes?

(*From gapingvoid’s blog: Oh, you can’t take that away from me.)
(**From John O’Donohue’s Anam Cara.)
(^From Sherry Turkle’s Alone Together.)

open seeing

We see what we want to see, not necessarily what is there.

When our expectations are not met, disappointment and unhappiness may follow.

To see only what we want to see hides so many things we do not want to see and with these, things we not able to see.

Life is seeing, it’s learning to open our eyes so we may see more.  When we see more, perhaps joy will follow.

Cosmologist Sean Carroll uses the term poetic naturalism to identify the way we look upon a universe that we know so little about and yet bring meaning to, meaning that grows as we continue to explore:

“Life is a process, not a substance, and it is necessarily temporary.  We are not the reason for the existence of the universe, but our ability for self-awareness and reflection makes us special within it.”*

Novelist and philosopher Iris Murdoch uses the word “attention” to identify seeing that is more than “looking” – looking, she says, is a neutral way of seeing:

‘I can only choose within the world I can see, in the moral sense of ‘see’ which implies that clear vision is a result of moral imagination and moral effort.’**

Seeing is about who we are, who we are becoming, it’s full of stories and fables and myths with triumphs and failures, with conflicts and strivings.  It is no small surprise, then, that we change the universe by our seeing.

This is our art.

‘If you want to achieve the unimaginable, you start by imagining it.’^

(*Sean Carroll, quoted in Maria Popova’s Brain Pickings: Existential Therapy from the Universe.)
(**From Iris Murdoch’s The Sovereignty of Good.)
(^From Chris Guillebeau’s The Happiness of Pursuit.)

new time

‘The mind is never beyond redemption, for no environment can extinguish neorogenesis. […] neorogensis is cellular evidence that we evolved to never stop evolving.’*

‘Even though I’m beyond seventy now, new relationships still astound nee: I’ll meet a new person, and if I can interface with them honestly, trust them, allow them, refuse to categorise or too quickly label them – it will invariably open up inside me new realms of my being that I didn’t know existed until I was in relationship with them.’**

Instead of judging each other, how might it be possible to help one another thrive?

People may choose not to live their lives meaningfully in the same way as you or I define meaningful but at least they could know what humans are capable of – possibilities that are still growing and opening as we push back the borders of our unknowing.  Then it’s their choice.

Has everyone been given the same information about their amazing capacity to develop and thrive?  By their parents, their teachers, their friends, their co-workers and employers, their politicians, by their loving others?  Just to be able to know is to be given a better choice.

When we judge quickly – in seconds and minutes – the possibility of choice for another is diminished.  When we judge slowly – over years and decades and even a lifetime – then the possibility of choice is increased.

In his book Helping, Edgar Schein claims we’re sending out “testing signals” all the time, checking on whether these people we are meeting can be trusted, will they help us, what do they think of us?  When we miss these signals we can unknowingly close down possibilities of new realms of being – a little less information for people to make up their minds and hearts by, less information building up over time.

Obversely, when we remain open to one another when we try not to judge, allowing people to enter a new time of possibility.

(*From Jonah Lehrer’s Proust was a Neuroscientist.)
(**From Richard Rohr’s The Divine Dance.)